Lab 4 Rubric
Total: 18 points
Each row is scored from 0–3 points based on the criteria.
| Lab activity | 3 points | 2 points | 1 point | 0 points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restate research question | Research question is clearly and correctly restated. | Research question is mostly clear, but minor issues with clarity. | Research question is vague or partially incomplete. | Research question is missing. |
| Step 1: SLR Screening | All 16 variables are tested against the outcome; results (F-stats/p-values) are clearly displayed using add1() or individual models. |
Most variables are tested, but some are missing or results are difficult to find. | Only a few variables are tested or code contains significant errors. | No SLR screening performed. |
| Step 2: Preliminary Selection | Correct logic applied (p < 0.25); initial MLR model is fit with the correct subset and table is displayed. | Model fit with minor errors in variable selection logic or table formatting. | Model fit attempted but ignores the p < 0.25 selection rule. | No preliminary MLR model provided. |
| Step 3: Purposeful Selection Logic | Provides clear explanation for every dropped variable (common sense + p-value + \(\Delta\%\)) and includes code for at least one \(\Delta\%\) calculation. | Explains dropped variables but lacks the code example for \(\Delta\%\) or reasoning is inconsistent. | Variables are dropped without explanation or logical justification. | No evidence of the variable reduction process. |
| Step 5: Interaction Testing | Uses add1() correctly to test interactions; adds one subquestion interaction (if applicable) and runs the updated model. |
Tests interactions but misinterprets significance or fails to run the final updated model. | Attempted interaction testing but code is broken or logic is fundamentally flawed. | Interaction testing is missing. |
| Final Visualization (Forest/Table) | Produces a clean, readable Forest Plot or tbl_regression(); labels are formatted (not raw code names) and axes are clear. |
Visualization is produced but is messy (e.g., raw variable names like att7) or difficult to read. |
Visualization is attempted but missing key components like Confidence Intervals. | No forest plot or regression table provided. |